The velvet underground and Nico were definitely unique for
their time. They sought to bring together art and music in a way that had never
been done before. Describing their own music as “avant garde” they were very
“artsy” as some might say. The music was very simplistic and it seems that when
you listen to it the band doesn’t care if they sound good or not (in fact they
almost say exactly that in the documentary). This makes for very boring and
unemotional songs that never really had any attachment to anything. Their image
is that of the New York Hipster of today. They claim to not care about money
and are only in it for the art but then they go on to almost brag about not
being able to really play an instrument (this would be like a painter who cant
paint). What really frustrated me when researching them is that they come off
very pretentious like they’re music is somehow better or more meaningful then
other people’s music. The main songwriters of the band Lou Reed and John Cale
were the main artistic visionaries of the band. Lou being a native New Yorker
didn’t have any formal training besides playing is garage bands while his
counter part John Cale came to the United States to study classical music. Lou
had much more of a singer songwriter style and Cale was much more of an
“artist”. After their first albums came out artist Andy Warhol who set them up
with Nico recognized them. His vision was to combine art, music, and film to
make a completely new style and culture. Something that really set them apart from
everyone else is the fact that they really don’t seem to care whether they sell
records or if people like them. They would be perfectly content with making
music and living on no money (or so they say). Another thing that really set
them apart from everyone was just their aesthetic in general. They really
didn’t look or sound like anyone else from that time. It seems like they would
fit in more with the New York City hipsters of today. The impression that I get
as a profession is not a very good one. I see mediocre songwriting coupled with
terrible production and extremely boring performances. As just a passive
listener I suppose is isn’t all that bad but I cant get over the fact that they
just don’t put any emotion into anything. If I had to rate this album it would
only get one star.
Steve,
ReplyDeleteUpon reading your blog post i can see that you did a lot of research on your topic and provided what you found in a way that flows nicely. You cover all the topics that are required for the post and a little bit more. My favorite part of your post is when you say "It seems like they would fit in more with the New York City hipsters of today". I feel that to be a true statement too. I also agree with you're rating of the album by giving one star from a production stand point. good job and keep up the great posts
-Dustin Breeden